Obviously I don't think say Rockstar should be on the hook for paying for servers for GTA V so people who didn't pay for the game could play on them. I'd have no problem with DRM like Denuvo if it would be removed say two years after release when the publisher has made the vast majority of the money they'd make from the game. That's why I download cracked versions of games I buy. By that I mean that if I want to play the game ten years from now and Denuvo doesn't have their authentication servers up anymore, I'd be shit out of luck. The main problem I have with DRM is I feel like I don't own the game if it has uncracked DRM. It's just additional crap that the MPAA and RIAA want to use for them to legally rape your wallet, under their interpretation of copyright law. I think there is a place and use for DRM, but I do agree that it reaches far beyond what it should handle, and hinders more than it promotes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |